Propofol 2 mg/kg is superior to propofol 1 mg/kg for tracheal intubation in children during sevoflurane induction.

BACKGROUND: Propofol has been used to facilitate tracheal intubation within a short time of sevoflurane induction without a muscle relaxant in children. We compared as the primary outcome the incidence of excellent intubating conditions after 8% sevoflurane and propofol 1 or 2 mg/kg. METHODS: One hundred and four patients (2-7 years) were randomly assigned to receive propofol 1 mg/kg in group SP1 (n=53) or propofol 2 mg/kg in group SP2 (n=51) after inhalation induction using sevoflurane 8% in oxygen. Forty-five seconds after propofol and controlled ventilation, intubating conditions were assessed using a four-point scoring system based on ease of laryngoscopy, vocal cords position, coughing, jaw relaxation and limb movement. Heart rate and systolic blood pressure were measured as baseline, after sevoflurane induction, propofol, intubation and at 2 and 5 min following intubation. RESULTS: Three patients in group SP1 were excluded from analysis. Time from sevoflurane induction to intubation (248.9±71.3 s in group SP1 vs. 230.9±61.3 s in group SP2) and endtidal sevoflurane before intubation (5.6±1.6% in group SP1 vs. 5.2±1.5% in group SP2) did not differ between the two groups. The incidence of excellent intubating conditions was significantly higher in group SP2 compared with group SP1 [47/51 (92%) vs. 28/50 (56%)]. The incidence of acceptable intubating conditions was significantly higher in group SP2 compared with group SP1 [48/51 (94%) vs. 35/50 (70%)]. No hemodynamic difference was noted at any time point between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Propofol 2 mg/kg during 8% sevoflurane induction resulted in a higher proportion of excellent intubating conditions compared with propofol 1 mg/kg.

Effect of suxamethonium vs rocuronium on onset of oxygen desaturation during apnoea following rapid sequence induction.

This study investigates the effect of suxamethonium vs rocuronium on the onset of haemoglobin desaturation during apnoea, following rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia. Sixty patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups. Anaesthesia was induced with lidocaine 1.5 mg.kg(-1), fentanyl 2 microg.kg(-1) and propofol 2 mg.kg(-1), followed by either rocuronium 1 mg.kg(-1) (Group R) or suxamethonium 1.5 mg.kg(-1) (Group S). The third group received propofol 2 mg.kg(-1) and suxamethonium 1.5 mg.kg(-1) only (Group SO). The median (IQR [range]) time to reach S(p)O(2) of 95% was significantly shorter in Group S (358 (311-373 [245-430]) s) [corrected] than in Group R (378 (370-393 [366-420]) s; p = 0.003), and shorter in Group SO (242 (225-258 [189-270]) s) [corrected] than in both Group R (p < 0.001) and Group S (p < 0.001). When suxamethonium is administered for rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia, a faster onset of oxygen desaturation is observed during the subsequent apnoea compared with rocuronium. However, time to desaturation is prolonged whenever lidocaine and fentanyl precede suxamethonium.

Ondansetron is as effective as diphenhydramine for treatment of morphine-induced pruritus after cesarean delivery.

BACKGROUND: Subarachnoid (SA) morphine, highly effective for the management of pain after a cesarean delivery, is associated with a significant incidence of pruritus in up to 80% of patients. No previous study has compared the effectiveness of ondansetron (5-HT(3) antagonist) vs. diphenhydramine (H(1) receptor blocker) for the treatment of this side effect. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind study, 113 patients with a pruritus score 3 or 4 (1=absent; 2=mild, no treatment required; 3=moderate pruritus, treatment required; and 4=severe pruritus) after SA morphine 0.2 mg were assigned to group ondansetron, which received 4 mg intravenously (i.v.) ondansetron, and group diphenhydramine, which received 25 mg i.v. diphenhydramine. Patients who continued to have pruritus > or =3, 30 min after the study drug were considered treatment failures and were treated with naloxone 0.04 mg i.v. repeatedly, as well as patients who relapsed. Pain scores, nausea, vomiting, and sedation were determined before and 30 min after the study drugs were administered. Patients were followed up for 24 h. RESULTS: The success rate was comparable between the two groups [40/57 (70%) and 38/56 (70%), P=0.79, in group ondansetron and group diphenhydramine, respectively]. Among the successfully treated patients, the recurrence rates of moderate to severe pruritus were 11/40 (28%) in group ondansetron and 13/38 (35%) in group diphenhydramine, P=0.52. The side effect profile was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Ondansetron is as effective as diphenhydramine in relieving pruritus caused by SA morphine in patients undergoing a cesarean delivery. However, up to 50% of patients required naloxone either for primary failure or for recurrence.

Comparison of three doses of epidural fentanyl followed by bupivacaine and fentanyl for labor analgesia.

BACKGROUND: Epidural fentanyl 100 microg after lidocaine-epinephrine test dose has been shown to provide adequate analgesia in early labor. This investigation determines the effect of three different bolus doses of epidural fentanyl on duration and quality of analgesia during early first stage of labor. METHODS: In this prospective, double-blind study, 103 laboring nulliparous at cervical dilation <5 cm were enrolled. After an epidural test dose of lidocaine (60 mg) with epinephrine (15 microg), parturients received, randomly, bolus of epidural fentanyl 50, 75, or 100 microg, followed by a continuous infusion of epidural bupivacaine 0.0625% and fentanyl 3 microg/ml at a rate of 10 ml/h. Pain scores and maternal sedation, pruritus, nausea, and vomiting were recorded 10, 20, and 30 min after fentanyl, and every 30 min thereafter until first request for additional analgesia. RESULTS: Adequate analgesia was achieved in 87% (28/32), 94% (35/38), and 94% (31/33) in the fentanyl 50, 75, and 100 microg groups within 20 min. Mean duration of analgesia before re-dosing was significantly longer in fentanyl 100 and 75 microg groups (185.6+/-82.9 and 188.5+/-82.2 min, respectively) as compared with fentanyl 50 microg group (133.6+/-46.2 min, P<0.016). There was no difference in the incidence of maternal side effects or neonatal Apgar scores among the three groups. CONCLUSION: After a test dose of lidocaine-epinephrine, the three epidural fentanyl doses produced similar effective labor analgesia. However, epidural fentanyl 75 microg followed by epidural infusion of dilute bupivacaine and fentanyl produced longer duration of analgesia than fentanyl 50 microg followed by the same infusion, with no further prolongation when the dose of fentanyl was increased up to 100 microg.

Supplementation of pre-oxygenation in morbidly obese patients using nasopharyngeal oxygen insufflation.

During apnoea following induction of anaesthesia, morbidly obese patients may suffer a rapid decrease in oxygen saturation. This study compares pre-oxygenation alone with pre-oxygenation followed by nasopharyngeal oxygen insufflation on the onset of desaturation occurring during the subsequent apnoea. A randomised controlled trial was performed in 34 morbidly obese patients undergoing gastric bypass or gastric band surgery. Seventeen patients received nasopharyngeal oxygen supplementation following pre-oxygenation (Study group, body mass index = 41.8 (6.9) kg.m(-2)), and the other 17 patients received pre-oxygenation alone (Control group, body mass index = 42.7 (5.4) kg.m(-2)). Time from the onset of apnoea until S(p)o(2) fell to 95% was compared between the two groups with a cut-off of 4 min. In the control group, the S(p)o(2) fell from 100% to 95% during the subsequent apnoea in 145 (27) s, with a significantly negative correlation (r(2) = 0.66, p < 0.05) between the time to desaturation to 95% and the body mass index. In the study group, the S(p)o(2) was maintained in 16 of 17 patients at 100% for 4 min when apnoea was terminated. In conclusion, nasopharyngeal oxygen insufflation following pre-oxygenation in morbidly obese patients delays the onset of oxyhaemoglobin desaturation during the subsequent apnoea.

Haloperidol vs. ondansetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting following gynaecological surgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Ondansetron is widely used for the prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting, while haloperidol is an antiemetic that lacks recent data on efficacy and adverse effects. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study involving 93 females undergoing gynaecological procedures under general anaesthesia, we compared the efficacy and adverse effects of prophylactic haloperidol 1 mg intravenous and ondansetron 4 mg intravenous vs. placebo. RESULTS: During the overall observation period (0-24 h), in the haloperidol, ondansetron and placebo groups respectively, the incidence of nausea and/or vomiting was 40.7% (11/27), 48.2% (13/27) and 55.5% (15/27), and the need of rescue antiemetics was 22.2% (6/27), 44.4% (12/27) and 40.7% (11/27), with P values >0.05 among the three groups. During the early observation period (0-2 h), in the haloperidol, ondansetron and placebo groups respectively, the incidence of nausea and/or vomiting was 13.7% (4/29), 26.6% (8/30) and 43% (13/30), and the need for rescue antiemetics was 6.8% (2/29), 26.6% (8/30) and 36.6% (11/30). Between haloperidol and placebo groups, the P value was 0.04 for nausea and/or vomiting, and was 0.01 for rescue antiemetics, in addition to lower nausea scores (P = 0.03). During the late observation period (2-24 h), no significant difference was shown among the three groups. CONCLUSION: The prophylactic administration of 1 mg intravenous haloperidol or 4 mg ondansetron, in female patients undergoing gynaecological surgery, did not improve the overall incidence of nausea and/or vomiting vs. placebo. However, haloperidol 1 mg proved to be an effective antiemetic in the early observation period without significant adverse effects.

Nasopharyngeal oxygen insufflation following pre-oxygenation using the four deep breath technique.

This paper evaluates the effectiveness of nasopharyngeal oxygen insufflation following preoxygenation using the four deep breath technique within 30 s, on the onset of haemoglobin desaturation during the subsequent apnoea. Thirty ASA I or II patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups. In the study group (n = 15), pre-oxygenation was followed by insufflation of oxygen at a flow of 5 l.min(-1) via a nasopharyngeal catheter commenced at the onset of apnoea. In the control group, pre-oxygenation was not followed by nasopharyngeal oxygen insufflation (n = 15). In the control group, SpO2 fell to 95% within a mean (SD) apnoea time of 3.65 (1.15) min, whereas in the study group, SpO2 was maintained in all patients at 100% throughout the 6 min of apnoea, at which point apnoea was terminated and positive pressure ventilation commenced. We conclude that nasopharyngeal oxygen insufflation following pre-oxygenation using the four deep breath technique can delay the onset of haemoglobin desaturation for a significant period of time during the subsequent apnoea.

Comparison of three modes of patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labour.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study compares three modes of patient-controlled epidural analgesia in parturients during labour. METHODS: Eighty-four women were randomized to one of three groups. The epidural solution used in all the three groups was 0.1% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2 microg mL(-1). Patients were able to self administer a demand dose of 3 mL with a lockout interval of 6 min in Group A, 6 mL with a lockout interval of 12 min in Group B and 9 mL with lockout interval of 18 min in Group C. All patients received a background infusion at a rate of 6 mL h(-1). Visual analogue pain scores, pinprick analgesia and motor block were assessed hourly by a blinded observer. The physician-administered supplementation and the cumulative dose of bupivacaine were also compared between the three groups. RESULTS: Pain scores, sensory level and motor block were not different among the study groups. Patients' satisfaction was rated good to excellent with no difference among groups. The cumulative dose of bupivacaine was not significantly different. However, there was a trend towards a decreased need for rescue analgesia in Group C. Within each group, the physician-administered supplementations were significantly higher during the second stage of labour than during the first stage (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The three modes of patient-controlled epidural analgesia supplemented by a background infusion of 6 mL h(-1) were equally effective for labour analgesia with a trend for decreased rescue analgesia in the group with a larger bolus dose and a longer lockout interval.

Preoperative caudal block prevents emergence agitation in children following sevoflurane anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: The frequency of emergence agitation in children is increased following sevoflurane anesthesia. However, controversies still exist concerning the exact etiology of this postanesthetic problem. Although this phenomenon is present with adequate pain relief or even following pain-free procedures, pain is still regarded as a major contributing factor. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, double-blind study, we enrolled 48 premedicated and calm 2-6-year-old children undergoing inguinal hernia repair. We assigned children to one of two groups: children assigned to the caudal group (n = 24) received a caudal block to supplement sevoflurane, while children assigned to the fentanyl group (n = 24) received a bolus injection of 1 microg kg(-1) intravenous fentanyl before skin incision to supplement sevoflurane. In the post anesthesia care unit, all children were received by their parent, and the incidence of emergence agitation and pain scores, as well as hemodynamic changes, were compared in both groups. RESULTS: Forty-four children completed the study. In the fentanyl group, 59% of the children were agitated following emergence from anesthesia as compared to 4.5% in the caudal group (P < 0.001). Also, pain scores, mean values of heart rate and blood pressure as well as morphine requirement were significantly higher in the post anesthesia care unit in the fentanyl group compared to the caudal group. CONCLUSION: Our results show that in children undergoing inguinal hernia repair, pain control with a preoperative caudal block as compared to intraoperative intravenous fentanyl significantly reduces the incidence of emergence agitation and pain scores following sevoflurane anesthesia.